Hey Martha...  Hop To Forum Categories  Ottumwa, IA  Hop To Forums  Headlines; Ottumwa, IA    Jury finds Locke not guilty
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
5-star Rating (3 Votes) Rate It!  Login/Join 
Basic training
Picture of LAWDAWG6811
Posted
RE: http://www.ottumwacourier.com/local/local_story_284103427.html

Can you believe this! Only in Ottumwa Iowa, Even if you believe the defense, at some point Sheri Locke chased Denham out of her bedroom by firing shots at him and continued to chase after him still shooting as he ran down the stairs and out of the house. At some point she became the aggressor and it resulted in his death. I feel for the family, it should have at least been a voluntary manslaughter conviction. I guess you could say that she definitely got a jury of her peers, 12 other nut cases from Ottumwa that think you can chase someone down and kill them if they come in your house. I am not a fan of Chuck Denham, but I feel for his family that just got slapped in the face. Not Guilty of anything, you have to be kidding me. What a joke...
 
Posts: 18 | Location: OSKALOOSA,IA | Registered: April 18, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Newcomer
Posted Hide Post
Well I knew chuck, and I know the way he was, and alot of things he has done over the years. If you ask me he got what was coming to him. I don't have a problem with the verdict at all. If a person enters someones home without permission they have a right to defend their home.
This should be a clear message to others, if you enter someones home unannounced or break in. it could cost you your life.
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: February 28, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Free Time
Posted Hide Post
Chalk one up for the good guys. God rewards people to do favors for society. I hope Sherri wins the Powerball because of all the media attention. She deserved to get off and justice was served.
 
Posts: 195 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: November 20, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Hold on there Lawdog. You supposedly being a police man should put you firmly on the side of justus has been served here. What, you only believe in the jury verdict if it is a guilty verdict? That is kinda why we have juries, sometimes they get it right. Even here in Iowa, where you are guilty until proven innocent, sometimes the juries see past all the lies that you police tell on the stand, and all the inuendo and baseless accusations the prosecuter makes, and finds the person NOT GUILTY. Doesn't that just chap your view of the how the world should be run? See, the real reason she got off those charges is because the Police just were not believable, (sometimes they lie)and the jury saw right through their false testimony. She walks and the prosecution takes one up the yazoo. Don't feel bad though, a really good Defense Lawyer tops a pis#poor Prosecuter every time. Now she should sue his estate and make them reimburse her for the costs of her defense. IMHO
 
Posts: 49 | Location: S.E. IOWA... U.S.A. | Registered: August 08, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic training
Posted Hide Post
Well I knew both parties real well. Its nice to see a woman who robbed her parents blind, and has screwed so many places of businesses out of money by writing back checks get away with murder now. Next time you are on west second look at that trailer park and how nice it looks. Just remember that was done with bad checks to Menards by Locke. Glad to see she can keep on screwing the public.
 
Posts: 25 | Location: Iowa | Registered: July 21, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic training
Posted Hide Post
I didn't know Denham, But I do know Locke, SHE SHOULD GROW OLDER IN PRISON!!! Why would you fire 2 bullets thru a pillow if not to surprise the VICTIM.I know the jury isn't suppose to be prejudiced, but WAKE UP PEOPLE!! Oh by the way I would bet that the taxpayers of Wapello co. will pay her legal bills, cause If i'm not mistaken all she has to do is pay a retainer for her high-dollar lawyer and they can't take him off after starting her defense. I know Mahaska PAID FOR SEVERAL TRIALS FOR THE GREEN KID BACK IN THE EARLY 90's for (supposedly} paying some dirt bag to kill his step-mom, Oh yeah his attorney was Parrish sr.
 
Posts: 27 | Location: native oskaloosan | Registered: March 05, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Stranger
Posted Hide Post
I have known Sherri Locke for about 20 years now and finder her not guilty has got to be one of the worst things they could have done. She has burnt down two houses that I know of for the insurance. And yes I know for a fact that this happened because she told me she did. This ***** should be locked up.
Just like Paul Harvey said on his radio show one day "If you want to get away with a murder go to ottumwa iowa".
 
Posts: 4 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: February 04, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Stranger
Posted Hide Post
you guys must find yourself's all knowing to think you have the right to judge! were you there, how do you know she was in the wrong? Her daughter told a lot about the abuse her mom had to go through, it was either kill or be killed. honestly I think the only reason they tried so hard to make her guilty was because the police here in Ottumwa never did anything to stop the abuse when they reported it. My father-in-law was raised with the Denham family and he says they all have violent streaks, and sooner or later someone would have died by Chuck. Some of his family had to leave Ottumwa because they recieved death threats. Besides, I think he got what he deserved. I honestly don't feel for the family much either, raise your kids better. Don't tell them it's ok to carry around blades and brass knuckles and expect them to take it sitting down. I would have done it too if I had to save my life.
 
Posts: 1 | Location: O-Town | Registered: June 21, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Painted Lady
Posted Hide Post
I have read all of the posts on this subject and trying as hard as I could, I couldn't stay out of it myself. It is beyond me where most of you people get off arm chair judging this case by just what you have read or heard or knew of in their family history. That is why we have a judicial system in place. It is to sort through the evidence and make an INFORMED decision. I am related to both Locke and Denham. And I myself waivered back and forth as I read more and more on the case but in the end, I found myself torn as to how I even felt. I'm glad that the jury had alot more evidence to help make their decision. I will make this comment though. IF she had tried to kill him prior to that night and IF she was stalking him and IF he was so afraid of her, WHY was he in HER home with his shoes off in the middle of the night with his truck parked somewhere else? I honestly can't see how anyone can call him completely innocent in this situation. This would APPEAR to me as a man out for a little late night rendeavous that went horribly wrong! BUT.... if that is indeed the case,and it was never denied that he was indeed a cheater, I think a cheater deserves whatever hand he's dealt.As to whether she should have been found guilty or not, only the jury knows the reasons why they chose what they did, and I for one will respect their decision.I'm sure they wish the rest of you would too. Wink JMHO
 
Posts: 44 | Location: Oskaloosa IA | Registered: October 05, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic training
Picture of John_boy
Posted Hide Post
Well spoken Painted Lady.
 
Posts: 29 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: June 19, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Basic training
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Painted Lady:
I have read all of the posts on this subject and trying as hard as I could, I couldn't stay out of it myself. It is beyond me where most of you people get off arm chair judging this case by just what you have read or heard or knew of in their family history. That is why we have a judicial system in place. It is to sort through the evidence and make an INFORMED decision. I am related to both Locke and Denham. And I myself waivered back and forth as I read more and more on the case but in the end, I found myself torn as to how I even felt. I'm glad that the jury had alot more evidence to help make their decision. I will make this comment though. IF she had tried to kill him prior to that night and IF she was stalking him and IF he was so afraid of her, WHY was he in HER home with his shoes off in the middle of the night with his truck parked somewhere else? I honestly can't see how anyone can call him completely innocent in this situation. This would APPEAR to me as a man out for a little late night rendeavous that went horribly wrong! BUT.... if that is indeed the case,and it was never denied that he was indeed a cheater, I think a cheater deserves whatever hand he's dealt.As to whether she should have been found guilty or not, only the jury knows the reasons why they chose what they did, and I for one will respect their decision.I'm sure they wish the rest of you would too. Wink JMHO


You got to be kidding right? What year is this? I thought we had ways to protect battered women? What was I thinking. I am not saying a don't respect the juries decision. That is what they decided then that is what we live with. As far as us arm chair judging I would rather do that any day then be the Judge, Jury, and Executioner of a person. As far as Locke trying to kill Denham a few weeks before she got the job done read the "Denham family comments on trial" it tells a little more about that.

http://www.ottumwacourier.com/letters/local_story_28800...tml?keyword=topstory
 
Posts: 25 | Location: Iowa | Registered: July 21, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Newcomer
Posted Hide Post
good point, lets see. they were swimming or what ever Sherri supposedly cut the inter tube that Chuck was in knowing that he couldn't swim. But yet some how miraculously Chuck made it to shore. I thought he couldn't swim. And he went and pressed charges on her, but she wasn't arrested to my knowledge. That's interesting. You would think if a person REALLY tried to kill someone that person would have been arrested. And the family even admits they don't understand why Chuck didn't see the charges through. probably because he made the whole thing up! If someone really tried to kill you, what are you just going to forget about it? And a few weeks later go to that persons house unannounced? If that is what happened, I must say he wasn't very smart. Who in their right mind would sneak into someones house who had tried to kill them, unless it either didn't happen or he was there to kill her himself. It's not brain surgery folks. If you play with fire sooner or later your going to get burnt.
 
Posts: 13 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: February 28, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Stranger
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ray Mallonee:
Well I knew chuck, and I know the way he was, and alot of things he has done over the years. If you ask me he got what was coming to him. I don't have a problem with the verdict at all. If a person enters someones home without permission they have a right to defend their home.
This should be a clear message to others, if you enter someones home unannounced or break in. it could cost you your life.
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: October 25, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Stranger
Posted Hide Post
I've known Chuck Denham for 30 years and I am well aware of the faults he had. I have known of Sheri Locke for about 11 years and I know that she portrays herself as the victim everyday of her life, many people have suffered from her actions, she plans ,schemes and manipulates everyone she comes in contact! I'm not condoning what went on between the two of them and we will never know the truth of what actually happened that night, but I do know that the events of that evening destroyed many people! It took a husband, a father, a grandfather and a great grandfather of three babies he never got the chance to see. It's easy for some of you to play all big and bad and pretend you have all the answers, that's what all fools do when a tradgety hits, especially in your own hometown. I can't just sit here and do nothing, it infuriates me to listen to the garbage that comes from people who say they knew him. You forgot to mention that he loved his family and would go to the ends of the earth for each and everyone of them. You didn't mention the fact that he had helped so many when they had no one to turn to. Did you ever stop to think that this could have happened to someone you love? Twelve people sat on that jury and allowed her to go free! She's not done by a long shot, she'll continue to harrass, plot and make fools of the very people that set her free. Sending her to prison sure wouldn't bring Chuck back or even ease the pain that the family feels and will have to deal with the rest of their lives, but it would most certainly stop her from hurting someone else. Think about that before you pass out judgement on a subject you know nothing about! I know what I'm talking about....I am his widow!
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Ottumwa | Registered: October 25, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Stranger
Posted Hide Post
I have lived in Ottumwa all my life and I am so glad to see that Chuck finally got what he was deserved!! He may have loved his family but what about all those innocent families he ROBBED and done many acts of violence too??? My grandfather was self employed and always tried to help everyone. Not once or twice but MANY times Chuck robbed him this I know for a FACT!! So I tend to believe all the stories that goes with his life style. As far as Ms. Locke, I know only what I have read about her but I will say this, if she wouldn't have done it then i'm sure one of his other girlfriends or someone else he did wrong would have, he had many enemies, and I think he was living on borrowed time anyway. As far as some of his family having to leave town... well maybe they are scared of their past catching up with them too, so I think its a bunch of crap saying he loved his family sooo much. If he cared so much, why did he live the life style he did...girlfriends, drugs, theft, and much much more!!! I think he proved how much he loved his family there!!
 
Posts: 2 | Location: iowa | Registered: October 26, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community Page 1 2  
 

    Hey Martha...  Hop To Forum Categories  Ottumwa, IA  Hop To Forums  Headlines; Ottumwa, IA    Jury finds Locke not guilty