![]() |
|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Old Pro |
May 06, 2008
Random Events By Thomas Sowell Sometimes unrelated events nevertheless tell a coherent story. One newspaper story that caught my eye recently was about two high-powered schools in South Korea where Korean girls study 15 hours a day, preparing themselves for tests to get into elite colleges in the United States. Harvard, Yale and Princeton already have 34 students from those schools. When a copy of the 50th anniversary report on members of the Harvard class of 1958 arrived in the mail recently, I thought back to one of my fellow students in that class who had worn a hole in the sole of his shoe but put a folded piece of newspaper in his shoe to cover the hole, rather than tell his parents. He realized that they would buy him a new pair of shoes if they knew-- and he also realized that they could not afford it. He went on to become a professor at several well-known medical schools and to have various achievements and honors over the years. From even further back in time, I received a letter recently from a man who grew up in my old neighborhood back in Harlem. When he and I were in the same junior high school, one day a teacher who saw him eating his brown bag lunch suddenly arranged for him to get a lunch from the school cafeteria without having to pay for it. It happened so fast that my schoolmate had already taken a bite from the school lunch when he suddenly realized that he had been given charity-- and he wouldn't swallow the food. Instead he went to the toilet and spat it out. By now his brown bag lunch had been thrown out, so he just went hungry that day. He went on to become a very successful psychiatrist. Like everyone else, I have also been hearing a lot lately about Jeremiah Wright, former pastor of the church that Barack Obama has belonged to for 20 years. Both men, in their different ways, have for decades been promoting the far left vision of victimization and grievances-- Wright from his pulpit and Obama in roles ranging from community organizer to the United States Senate, where he has had the farthest left voting record. Later, when the ultimate political prize-- the White House-- loomed on the horizon, Obama did a complete makeover, now portraying himself as a healer of divisions. The difference between Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright is that they are addressing different audiences, using different styles adapted to those audiences. It is a difference between upscale demagoguery and ghetto demagoguery, playing the audience for suckers in both cases. People on the far left like to flatter themselves that they are for the poor and the downtrodden. But what is most likely to lift people out of poverty-- telling them that the world has done them wrong or promoting the work ethic of the Korean girls, the dogged determination of my Harvard classmate with the newspaper in his shoe, or the self-reliance of my fellow junior high school student in Harlem who had too much pride to take charity? When young people go out into the world, what will they have to offer that can gain them the rewards they seek from others and the achievements they need for themselves? Will they have the skills of science, technology or medicine? Or will they have only the resentments that have been whipped up by the likes of Jeremiah Wright or the sense of entitlement from the government that has been Barack Obama's stock in trade? In the real world, a sense of grievance or entitlement, as a result of the mistreatment of your ancestors, is not likely to get you very far with people who are too busy dealing with current economic realities to spend much time thinking about their own ancestors, much less other people's ancestors. Another seemingly unrelated experience was being in a crowd at a graveside in a Jewish cemetery last week. That crowd included people who were black, white, Asian, Catholic, Jewish and no doubt others. This country has come a long way, just in my lifetime. We don't need people like either Jeremiah Wright or Barack Obama to take us backward. The time is long overdue to stop gullibly accepting the left's vision of itself as idealistic, rather than self-aggrandizing. |
||
|
|
Old Pro |
I was going to post this earlier and got busy. Sowell is a good writer, and certainly seems happier than ol' Rev. Wright, doesn't he? |
|||
|
|
Old Pro |
I really enjoy Sowell's work. Here's a guy that grew up in Harlem without his biological mother and father, dropped out of school, and went on to lead an amazing life.
Amazing what the human being can do! Imagine if he excepted the liberals labels and logic and felt entitled to what he earned? |
|||
|
|
Educated |
On that point, I believe Mr. Sowell and others, might well be very wrong about Obama and others of his age group and race. I'm not so sure the entitlements HAVE been his "stock in trade". though they must have been for Wright's ( and my I am beginning to see that people of Obama's generation never knew where the entitlements began and ended, in the same way I (or Wright or Sowell) perceive them. That makes them all a kind of social hybrid, about which their elders know next to nothing. Their language doesn't even mean what ours does when using identical words at times. I don't know that this will make them any more skilled at handling the complexities they are undertaking, but it certainly will be different... and I, for one, am willing to give them a shot at it. Indeed, I am rather weary of the whole thing at this point anyway. |
|||
|
|
Educated |
excepted not including; apart from. |
|||
|
|
Old Pro |
The problem I have with Sowell is that his view is horribly slanted. He asks:
And the answer is--not if they have to depend on Republicans! No one has done more harm to people trying to lift themselves out of poverty than the GD Republicans! They've cut money for student loans, for education grants, for head start programs, for early childhood development programs, for school lunch programs. If Abe Lincoln had grown up with this batch of Republicans running things, they would have taken his piece of chalk and his lamp he studied with at night, and told him that he shouldn't borrow books--that's asking for a handout. Yeah--I know, my view of Republicans is slanted. That's because I've been listening to the bastards spin the same lies for thirty years or so. Sowell says the country "has come a long way" in his lifetime. That would be no thanks to the GD Republican party, which has opposed every positive social change in this country's history, and hasn't gotten one right since Lincoln. We don't need people like Thomas Sowell or John McCain to take this country backwards--which is the only way the Republicans face. All their rhetoric is about the good old days and preserving the status quo. |
|||
|
|
Free Time |
O.K. Pete. Let's see the numbers to back up your statements. Education spending has been going up at a far faster rate then inflation for a long time and continues to do so. What does not go up is learning. Could that be because the education establishment is owned and operated by liberals (read Democrats). Liberals run the teacher unions and the large majority of colleges. Blaming education woes on Republicans alone is ridiculous. I'll bet you cannot show a single program that has been cut in real dollars and not replaced with something even more expensive. Some of their increases may have been limited, but that is not a cut. Here are the real numbers. http://www.ed.gov/about/overview/fed/10facts/index.html |
|||
|
|
Regular |
Studying makes you wise.
|
|||
|
|
Old Pro |
I assume this is another "get a PA post." You sure spend a lot of time thinking about me sport! I also like the "GD" before the Republican party. Didn't Wright use that word a lot? He's got an interesting 9/11 theory as well. Where have you been these past 20 years Peter? Sitting next to Obama?! Luckily though, through all this DOOM AND GLOOM Republicans caused, we have a few liberals that can change it all. Not sure what is funnier, that you said all that or that you still act like you aren't a liberal!!!! |
|||
|
|
Free Time |
Liberals good intentions driving up the price of education. As usual the principles of liberals damage real people.
Popping the Higher Ed Bubble Yesterday, Instapundit linked to an interesting article here about "the next market bubble" being higher education, where government subsidies (obstensibly, to improve access to higher education) have had the unintended (but certainly foreseeable) consequence of inflating the costs of college: "Over the last 10 years, after adjusting for inflation, tuition is up 48% at public schools and 24% at private schools." There are several important parallels with the recent housing bubble; policy goals of extending participation (in higher education, in home ownership) led to people with serious credit risks borrowing a lot to pay a lot for something that, it turns out, isn't worth what they paid. (Instapundit also linked to a comment by Dean Esmay explaining his regret about ever bothering to pursue a college degree.) This bubble, like all bubbles, will have its tragic stories, so I don't want to cheer this on. But if there's a silver lining, it's that it may make people rethink the value of those four years that polite society assumes you need. As someone who resents how those four years are often an indoctrination in politically correct sensibilities (see here), I think this is a conversation worth having. It's not to say that I didn't love my time at that elite institution I got to attend -- that university mentioned in the article that "recently constructed a fancy dorm that cost $70,000 more per bed than the median home price" -- but I'm guessing there were other ways I could have broaden my horizons and learned more for the money (though I doubt I could have learned more Marx...). But I suppose that people will still pursue college degrees until employers start removing that as a "get-in-the-door" requirement for job interviews, and start thinking about how some of the brightest people may be those that don't want to wait around for a diploma (Bill Gates anyone?). Any opinions out there about the value of your own college educations? And what could help unravel pop the bubble of prestige in college degrees (which -- given the leftward tilt of almost ALL colleges -- could be a major boost for the long-term viability of free-market ideas)? |
|||
|
|
Educated |
Excellent post, Mr. Franklin...
a. Mine consumed 6+ years from Junior College to State University to Private College; using zero loans, two years of GI Bill, four scholarships, Work-Study income, Teaching Assistantships and moonlighting WITH infants and adulterous wife in tow. b. I learned more about what eventually became the way I earned my living before retirement, from high school and USAF service, than from anything that happened (or I allowed to happen) in "higher education." c. The degrees were the key to the gate, not much more - for the career field I was in more than 35 years... which late in life did NOT qualify me to teach that career to college students. The university system didn't "like" the KIND (meaning the little alphabetic letters of which they were composed) naming the degrees I had, so, they proposed for me to complete a second Master's degree, naturally. VERY expensive time-consuming proposition that... just to enroll in courses I could have taught in my sleep being taught to me by adolescents who had never spent five minutes in the career field. d. I take that back. I DID learn one thing about the values and attributes of higher education: i.e. Most of those who make their living from it are intellectual sadists to one degree (pun intended) or another. e. My career was in academia, a form of it which was dependent upon the credentials mill for sustenance, and which systematically excluded qualified practical useful experience as years went by. It was highlighted by being subservient to co-worker experts whose greatest "significant contribution" to our industry consisted of the addition of, possibly, a single researched original paragraph in a published peer reviewed essay of between 5-10,000 words. f. I wouldn't have made a decent living for so long had I not bared my arse in the blizzard of bovine excrement, but then, I would not have learned the significance of early choosing a more congenial less cynical profession either. ~ What could pop the bubble of prestige in college degrees? > Perhaps the total collapse of the American economic system? Nothing short of that? |
|||
|
|
Old Pro |
Nice to see you back, Ben. And I don't blame Republicans "alone", but I do blame them. And it isn't a "cut" as long as you spend the money someplace else in the budget?? Wow, must be new math... Your link deals mostly with K-12 spending. I mentioned head start, but was mostly talking about college spending. The Republicans have not increased Pell Grant limits despite the fact education costs are skyrocketing--as everyone knows. And they did away with the tuition deduction for income tax purposes--THAT hit middle-class families pretty hard. They have allowed the States to merge head start funds with other funds--effectively ending the earmark that guaranteed specific spending amounts on those programs. And they DID cut spending on head start in 2008: http://www.results.org/website/article.asp?id=347 We could argue all day on whether colleges teach anything useful--but don't forget they are like any other producer of mass-consumed products, and have to cater to their customer's desires. And they spend huge amounts on plushing up dorms and classrooms not so they can charge more--it is so they can attract more business. Nobody wants to pay thousands of dollars to sit in crappy chairs in a dank, musty old building with leaky roofs. As for the fact that colleges tend to be run by liberals--well, what can I say? A little knowledge is a dangerous thing? Or perhaps conservatism appeals to the less educated? Anyway, if conservatives don't like what mainstream schools are peddling--there's always Bob Jones and Oral Roberts University.. |
|||
|
|
Free Time |
The point of the second article is it is a vicious circle. Raise the grants and the colleges raise prices even more and they have no accountability on how they spend their money.
Here are some additional thoughts by a guy named Jerry Pournelle. Thanks for the welcome back, but I should have just stayed away. As a product of the Korean GI Bill I can hardly denounce the concept. The problems really came when the intellectuals convinced people that "investment" in trade schools and such like wasn't as desirable as "investment" in higher education meaning universities. At the same time, the State Colleges became "State universities" and in the "upgrade" put more into graduate schools to the detriment of undergraduate education. We then poured more money into the "university" system which is quite unsuitable for education of more than about 25% of the population (I'd put that at a lower figure, but we can stay with that). Now a lot of students who would do well at "college" level education can't get that; they have to go to "universities" and learn French Narrative Theory in Freshman Comp. If investment is needed in "education" -- and it is -- it's in training in technical skills. Most of that could be done in high school. Of course the high school teachers don't want to work that hard and will stand in union solidarity with the college professors who want the large number of students willing to borrow money to go listen to foreign graduate students teach introductory math courses in incomprehensible dialects, but it's "world class" isn't it? Doesn't everyone deserve a "world class university education"? So we continue to neglect the great majority of our citizens to benefit a handful of intellectuals. And they never catch wise. |
|||
|
|
Educated |
Ayup... And then there's always this kind of stuff going on... Source: MYWAY.COM 5.7.08 -------------------------------------------------------- "Obama's strengths are among black voters and college-educated voters, but only 3.3 percent of West Virginians are black and only 16. 5 percent of residents have bachelor's degrees, more than 10 percentage points below the national average, U.S. Census figures show." ... as if having a college education makes a better voter? This message has been edited. Last edited by: Michael S. Bell, |
|||
|
|
Educated |
What we need is more philosophy phd's running more Native American living museums.
|
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community | Page 1 2 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

