Hillary may win big, if more and more people see this video clip below.
I don't know if "elitist" is the proper word for Mr.Obama. But his comments revealed something about him that is very uncomfortable. He hasn't explained yet why his supporters at that fund raiser in San Francisco were laughing at his comments. Watch the video at the link below, ask yourself what was so funny?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Video_from_San_Francisco.html

Here’s a Zapruder film analysis of Obama’s San Francisco remarks.

Watch the video clip again at the link below and listen carefully.

Is he making fun of himself? If so, here's the punch line: “I have a message for people in rural America as a 46 year old black man named Barrack Obama”.
silence , (cue crickets) ... The joke doesn’t work , UNLESS, the underlining understanding between Barrack and his supporters is "rural folks are backward, and maybe even a little bigoted",(wink wink, nudge nudge) then the punch line works. ( listen for the first laugh). Then the follow up line gets a bigger chortle with “then that adds another layer of scepticism"

Main Stream Media have already written the story line and this little insight of Obama doesn't fit. This video clip has not appeared on any network or cable TV news programs. Not once.

I’m posting this video clip link, and asking the question, what's so funny?
Let others make up their minds.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0408/Video_from_San_Francisco.html

Check this one out. He wasn't even a community activist:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDUTTzGgrJ8&feature=Play...9B3CBAB7959C&index=9

Here is why we as interested dnc party members have to be very careful in choosing Hillary Clinton on Tuesday.

First of all, to overcome the odds, she is at this time a huge long shot. Regardless of our vote in Indiana, she will have to convince the hand of super delegates to back her. Super delegates are in turmoil now because of the scandal of Peter Paul vs. the Clinton's which ultimately will hit the news lines much harder than a Jeremiah Wright or bitter-gate remarks.

Obama may have baggage, but the Clinton scandals are considered by party powers as already magnificent and many know the Clinton foundation funds are not all above board. Even today she dodged the donor issue on ABC.

Also remember, her husband goes back into the wall of our countries most sacred home having committed infidelity in those very halls. He is one of only two American presidents to have been impeached. The GOP blogs are built are really ugly, you only have to go to the web to begin finding them. They are infuriating but nonetheless much more inflammatory than those built against the Illinois senator.

Lastly, Clinton as nominee will see a huge number of new registered voters along with the money they have been donating to the dnc party going to a third party such as Ralph Nader or will simply stay home. The Paul scandal is so magnificent, she simply won't be able to gather the votes to overcome a GOP ticket. Here are a few of the Paul vs. Clinton blogs:

http://www.paulvclinton.com/pp_complaint_022504_njw.pdf

http://hillarytruth.blogspot.com/

http://www.hillaryproject.com/index.php?%2Fen%2Fstory-d..._february_21_2008%2F

http://www.paulvclinton.com/pp_complaint_022504_njw.pdf


http://www.topix.com/news/2008-presidential-election


http://forums.gainesville.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/f/8591089265/m/6631093896/p/1


http://www.nowpublic.com/world/paul-vs-clinton-fraud-ca...t-dispositions-begin

Please use common sense verses misinformed opinion, your vote may make a difference for Americans all around this great country.

If you want another eight years of Bush vote for Obama. If you truly want to win back the White House vote smart, vote Clinton.

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23643866-5013948,00.html

They all will lead us to the next level of stupidity